9.2k views
3 votes
Dusty is evaluating two bids to supply fence hardware for the 5 acres of pasture that need to be fenced. breezy submits a bid of​ $40 per unit with a defect rate of​ 3%, and lady's bid is​ $50 per unit with a defect rate of​ 0.5%. if a section of fence​ fails, it costs an average of​ $500 in losses and herding costs to round up all of the capybaras. dusty believes it will take 500 units to fence in this pasture​ configuration; which supplier should win the​ business?

2 Answers

7 votes
Dusty believes it will take 500 units to fence in this pasture​ configuration; and the supplier that should win the​ business is the lady.
User Pxwise
by
7.7k points
5 votes
Let us see it from a cost-efficiency point of view. We have that every unit of the first selles costs 40$. But the total cost might be higher, since there is a chance for defect. On average, on 3% of the cases the defect will happen and it will cost him 500$. Hence, on average, a fence unit from producer a costs 40$ and has a repair cost of 3%*500$=15$. The total thus is 55$. For the second provider of fences, the standard cost is 50$. Similarly, the average repair cost is 0,5%*500$=2,5$. Hence, the total cost per unit is 52,5$ (total cost=upfront payment+repair costs). We see thus that the lady should win the bid; even if you pay more upfront, the difference in durability makes up the cost difference.
User Theraloss
by
7.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.