Final answer:
The terms 'adversarial system,' 'straw polling,' and 'reserved powers' are not correctly matched with their definitions. The adversarial system refers to a legal system where two parties argue before a judge or jury, straw polling is an informal survey, and reserved powers are state powers not granted or prohibited to the federal government. Someone might choose a plea bargain over a trial for a potentially lighter sentence or less publicity.
Step-by-step explanation:
To address the student's questions, let's first identify the terms that are not correctly matched with their definitions:
- Adversarial system – This term is incorrectly defined as 'action against someone for breaking the law.' The correct definition is a legal system used in common law countries, where two advocates represent their parties' positions before an impartial person or group of people, typically a judge or jury, who attempt to determine the truth of the case.
- Straw polling – The definition provided is inaccurate. 'Straw polling' actually refers to an informal survey or poll, not necessarily one using a sample that does not match the population. It's typically used to gauge the popularity of an idea or candidate, but it's not scientifically rigorous.
- Reserved powers – These are not 'powers of the federal government not expressly stated.' Instead, reserved powers are those that are not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the states but are reserved for the states or the people by the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Why might someone accused of a crime negotiate a plea bargain rather than exercising the right to a trial by jury? A plea bargain could result in reduced charges, a lighter sentence, or other benefits for the accused, and it also avoids the uncertainty and public exposure of a trial.
The difference between a criminal case and a civil case is that a criminal case involves the government prosecuting a person for an act that has been classified as a crime, while a civil case typically involves private disputes between individuals over legal obligations and rights.
Answering the question about state constitutions, the right not protected by some state constitutions is c. the right to polygamous marriage.