Final answer:
To argue for varied meal options in cafeterias, it's effective to highlight the need for dietary diversity and better health outcomes. Survey results from campus food services indicating student preferences can also serve as compelling empirical evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Supporting Evidence for Varied Meal Choices in School Cafeterias
When constructing an argument for why school cafeterias should offer a variety of meal choices, a strong piece of supporting evidence would be based on nutritional diversity. For instance, a statement highlighting that providing multiple meal options caters to the diverse dietary requirements and preferences of the student body would underscore the importance of meal choice. Students have varying dietary restrictions, allergies, and cultural dietary practices that necessitate a diverse menu. Additionally, offering variety can lead to better health and nutrition outcomes for students. This corresponds with education on healthy eating, closing the gap between what students learn about nutrition and what is actually available to them in the cafeteria.
Moreover, it is valuable to present data or surveys from campus food services that show a demand for more options. Including empirical evidence, such as survey results that reflect student preferences for cafeteria meals, further strengthens the argument. Presenting findings from a survey asking questions like 'How often do you eat at a campus facility?' or 'When you eat on campus, which of these dining facilities do you choose?' can provide insights into current student behavior and dissatisfaction rates with the available food choices.