77.8k views
1 vote
(1) In 1751, the Philadelphia Provincial Assembly had a bell made. (2) It was for the new State House. (3) The bell weighed more than 2,000 pounds. (4) The bell was 12 feet in circumference around the bottom. (5) It came to be known as the Liberty Bell because it was inscribed with a motto about liberty. (6) Unfortunately, the Liberty Bell cracked in 1752 during a test ring. (7) To fix the bell, the Philadelphia Assembly had it recast. (8) Some people say the bell cracked again in 1835. (9) It was tolling for John Marshall’s funeral. (10) However, that is probably just a legend. (11) It is a fact that on February 22, 1846, the bell cracked again. (12) That crack could not be fixed. (13) The Liberty Bell has had a crack in it ever since.

Which is the most effective way to combine sentences 1 and 2?

User Vasylyna
by
5.2k points

2 Answers

5 votes
In 1751, the Philadelphia Provincial Assembly had a bell made for the new State House.
User Denis Alimov
by
5.3k points
1 vote

Answer:

The best way to combine sentences 1 and 2 is "In 1751, the Philadelphia Provincial Assembly had a bell made for the new State House"

Step-by-step explanation:

In roder to combine both sentences, the subject "it" is deleted since the personal pronoun makes reference to the noun "bell". Also, the verb to be "was" is deleted since both sentences are linked and the main verb is in sentence 1.

Sentence 2 "It was for the new State House" can be easily combined since it is short and its subject is a personal pronoun that is previously mentioned in sentence 1.

User Pawel Szulc
by
5.7k points