menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
Cal is driving a car in which duff is a passenger when an accident occurs. cal and duff are emotionally rattled, but neither is physically hurt. cal is not liable to duff on a negligence theory because
asked
Feb 7, 2019
126k
views
0
votes
Cal is driving a car in which duff is a passenger when an accident occurs. cal and duff are emotionally rattled, but neither is physically hurt. cal is not liable to duff on a negligence theory because
Social Studies
high-school
Yvetterowe
asked
by
Yvetterowe
7.9k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
5
votes
Cal is not liable to Duff on a negligence theory because
"Duff
was not injured".
Negligence is an inability to practice suitable or potentially moral ruled care anticipated that would be practiced among determined conditions. The region of tort law known as carelessness includes hurt caused by neglecting to go about as a type of imprudence conceivably with special conditions.
Fujia
answered
Feb 13, 2019
by
Fujia
7.7k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.5m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
Why did people immigrate to the United States in the late 1800s?
In the peaceful period of the Middle Kingdom, what area of culture thrived?
Why did the slogan Peace Land and Bread appeal to the Russian people?
Which city was located nearest the nile river delta
''Life in a city is more rewarding than life outside a city."List two or three arguments in favor of this opinion and two or three arguments opposing this opinion
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org