126k views
0 votes
Cal is driving a car in which duff is a passenger when an accident occurs. cal and duff are emotionally rattled, but neither is physically hurt. cal is not liable to duff on a negligence theory because​

User Yvetterowe
by
5.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes
Cal is not liable to Duff on a negligence theory because "Duff ​was not injured".


Negligence is an inability to practice suitable or potentially moral ruled care anticipated that would be practiced among determined conditions. The region of tort law known as carelessness includes hurt caused by neglecting to go about as a type of imprudence conceivably with special conditions.
User Fujia
by
5.5k points