Question

You may recall that neoclassical writers Jonathan Swift and Samuel Johnson were concerned about preserving the English language, which they believed was in a state of constant deterioration. Earlier in this unit, you completed an activity in which you analyzed language rules and related questions of usage. In this task, you will choose a common topic related to language usage and grammar, examine it in detail, and write a short essay to present your findings.

Answer 1

Language usage goes beyond mere communication; it reflects individuals' identity, community belonging, and the fine balance between professional and personal dialects. Analyzing group-specific jargon and language practices reveals the complex role language plays in shaping social dynamics. Writers must choose their English variety strategically, based on contexts and audience expectations, thereby showcasing their adaptability and literacy skills.

Step-by-step explanation:

Language is not only a means of communication but a representation of our identity, professional integrity, and cultural association. When writing an essay about ourselves, the language we employ varies vastly depending on the forum; it could range from colloquial in a casual setting to highly formal in an academic or professional scenario. The dynamics of language usage become particularly nuanced for groups that employ dialects or specialized vocabularies, such as employees with their corporate jargon or communities of color navigating bilingual identities between professional and personal spheres.

Within specific groups, lexical choices, acronyms, and even altered spellings may emerge that are distinct to insiders but opaque to outsiders. These linguistic markers serve multiple functions – they foster a sense of community, facilitate efficient communication, and also create a boundary that defines group membership. In examining our own group affiliations, we gain insight into how language usage serves as a means of both inclusion and exclusion.

Indeed, as writers, we are tasked with making strategic choices about the variety of English we employ. Engaging with different English varieties in various rhetorical situations necessitates a deep understanding of the audience and the expectations that pervade those communicative contexts. A writer's capability to switch between these varieties is a reflection of their rhetorical agility and cultural literacies, allowing them to preserve the integrity of their identity while also meeting, or intentionally subverting, the expectations of their audience.

Answer 2

"ain't"

Literature as early as 1706 can be found using the word am’t or ain’t as a contraction for a variety of words such as: am not, are not, is not, has not, have not, did not and was not. At that time, “ain’t” was accepted in conversational verbiage of the upper class such as Victorian lords and ladies. Works of literature in the 1800s however, associated the term “ain’t” with the lower class so avoiding it’s usage would clear oneself of association with that class.

I personally don’t use the word and think others should not either. When “ain’t” is used as a substitute for a variety of words, it only caters to a lazy vernacular. I believe we need to take a firm stance on this junk-shop word and not allow its usage further.

Language experts have a love-hate relationship with this word. Perhaps it’s the one word (if you can rightfully call it a word) in the English language that carries with it the most stigmatism. While experts can’t deny that it’s the verb in a sentence, it can carry with it a lazy or a bullying effect in the way it’s used. Unpacking the contraction in a sentence doesn’t always make sense either. For example: he ain’t who you thought he was would translate into he am not the person...

Then again, in the love realm, there’s the familiar conversation where you blurt out “ain’t she cute!” for it seems to give a cozy, intimate effect.

Radio and TV personalities, the President and teachers generally avoid using the word “ain’t”, as saying it from a professional platform would be like giving permission for it to be spoken. This approach is correct as the audience is neither informal nor to be bullied. There are times I’ve heard my friends use “ain’t”, but it’s more as a term used for it’s effect rather than consistent loose language.

I think it’s important when addressing anyone in a formal setting that the the word “ain’t” is not used because of the example it sets forth. If “ain’t” is used in conversation, I believe it should take place only when the group is small and familiar

Explanation: This is my personal answer about the use of "ain't"