191k views
1 vote
Suppose there is a policy debate over whether the United States should impose trade restrictions on imported steel rods: The president of the United States explains that it is necessary to impose trade restrictions, such as a tariff, on the steel-rod industry to protect workers in the domestic steel-rod industry. The president claims that without trade protection, there will be layoffs, causing many U.S. workers in the steel-rod industry to be unemployed. Which of the following justifications is the president using to argue for the trade restriction on steel rods?

A) Infant-industry argument
B) National-security argument
C) Saving-domestic-jobs argument
D) Unfair-competition argument
E) Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument

User KaroluS
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

C) Saving-domestic-jobs argument

Step-by-step explanation:

Saving domestic job argument is the argument that protectionism provides jobs for domestic workers. And that unfair trade creates domestic unemployment.

User Shayno
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.