Answer:
B. Yes, the proportion of girls is significantly different from 0.5
Explanation:
Given that a clinical trial tests a method designed to increase the probability of conceiving a girl. In the study 340 babies wereborn, and 306 of them were girls.
Sample proportion =
![(306)/(340) \\=0.9](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/kjtx7lldmog44cq0aaymbp1v5f6qoabb4k.png)
Std error of p =
![\sqrt{(pq)/(n) } \\=0.01627](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/14kryua859tsz30t30hm51v58tvj17xp0k.png)
For sample size large, we find that t distribution almost coincides with z distribution
Hence 99% critical value = 2.58
Margin of error = 2.58*std error = 0.0420
Confidence interval =
![(0.9-0.0420, 0.9+0.0420)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/iz7axu3s8upqzrcc4223p8lwyew9472re2.png)
=
![(0.858, 0.942)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/bfp5gf6sf1keh9f5t7h1ffgbea9tqhuxx9.png)
0.858<p<0.942
Yes, this method is effective becuse lower bound itself is 0.858 i.e. there is 85.8%chance for getting girls in birth
B. Yes, the proportion of girls is significantly different from 0.5