Question

What was a major difference between Britain's colonies in the South Pacific

and its colonies in India?
O
A. The colonies in India were used primarily as prisons for British
criminals.
O
B. The colonies in the South Pacific attracted far more British
immigrants.
O
C. The colonies in the South Pacific were considered more
economically important.
O
D. The colonies in India were established on land seized from native
peoples.

Answer 1

The major difference between Britain's colonies in the South Pacific and its colonies in India is that the colonies in India were established on seized land from native peoples, while the colonies in the South Pacific attracted more British immigrants.

Step-by-step explanation:

A major difference between Britain's colonies in the South Pacific and its colonies in India is that the colonies in India were established on land seized from native peoples, while the colonies in the South Pacific attracted far more British immigrants. In India, the British East India Company traded in spices, silk, cotton, and other goods before establishing colonies to take advantage of conflicts between kingdoms. On the other hand, in the South Pacific, Britain established a colony in Australia in 1788 and colonized New Zealand in 1840. These colonies were primarily settled by British immigrants.