Answer:
1. antibiotic-resistant
2. antiobiotic-sensitive
3. antibiotic-resistant
4. rare
5. increase
6. antiobiotic-sensitive
7. antibiotic-resistant
Step-by-step explanation:
The widespread use of antibiotics creates environments where antibiotic-resistant mutants have a selective advantage over wild-type antiobiotic-sensitive , antibiotic-sensitive bacteria. The antibiotic-resistant which were originally rare antibiotic-sensitive will increase in population frequency under these conditions, eventually replacing the antiobiotic-sensitive variants. Thus, infections are more likely to result from antibiotic-resistant strains.
Let assume that;
Antibiotic-senstitive bacteria are wild-type bacteria which are killed by antibiotics.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are mutant-bacteria which are not killed by antibiotics
Now in a population of species that are not affected by antibiotics, the antibiotic-resistant are RARE. But when exposed to antibiotics, majority (i.e 98%) of antibiotic-sensitive bacteria where destroyed, leaving 2% of antibiotic-resistant to survive in the population.
These mutants (antibiotic-resistant) would reciprocate uncurbed because they do not need to compete for resources with majority of wild-types.
Therefore, the new population would consist mostly of mutants that are antibiotic-resistants. As such, rendering that environment with infections most likely to be prevalent due to mutant-resistant bacteria because there are now very few species of wild-type antibiotic-sensitive bacteria in the new population.