Question

2. How were the results of the Tinker and Hazelwood cases different?

Answer 1

The Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District and Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier had different ways in which the courts treated each case. The first case, Tinker, upheld the students' right to free speech, while the second, Hazelwood, upheld the school's right to control student speech. This difference in outcome indicates that the courts may take different approaches when evaluating the balance of rights between schools and students. It suggests that the courts may treat speech related to social issues differently than they treat speech related to political topics.

Answer 2

The results of Tinker and Hazelwood were different because in Tinker, it was ruled in favor of the students because it was allowed unless it was disruptive but in the Hazelwood case, it ruled in favor of the school because the educators had the power to restrict what the student newspaper could publish.

Step-by-step explanation: