Question

An applicant for an office receptionist position is disqualified for furtherconsideration because she wears a hearing aid and the hiring manager needssomeone who has good hearing. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act,courts are most likely to rule that1- this action is not illegal because good hearing is an essential job function2-this action constitutes illegal discrimination because the applicant's hearing may beexcellent with the help of a hearing aid3-this action constitutes illegal discrimination because the employer is discriminating on thebasis of a perceived disability4- this action is not discrimination because the applicant is openly admitting to a disqualifyingdisability by wearing a hearing aid

Answer 1

2. This action constitutes illegal discrimination because the applicant's hearing may be excellent with the help of a hearing aid.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is most likely what the courts are going to rule when looking at this case. The Americans with Disabilities Act is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. It also requires covered employers to provide reasonable accomodations for employees with disabilities and imposes accessibility requirements on public accomodations. In this example, the courts are most likely to side with the employee, as the action would only be legal if the disability made it impossible for the employee to perform his job properly. However, the applicant's hearing would not be a problem if he was wearing a hearing device.