87.8k views
5 votes
Show that (-91(pvp)) +n is a tautology (i.e. (91(pvp)) +7=T). (a) (3 points) Show the equivalence using truth tables (b) (4 points) Show the equivalence by establishing a sequence of equiv- alences. You can only use the equivalences in Table 6 and the first equivalence in Table 7. Show your work by annotating every step.

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

techno never dies

Explanation:

techno never dies

User Justin XL
by
5.3k points
2 votes

Answer:

The statement
(\lnot q \land(p\lor p))\rightarrow \lnot q is a tautology

Explanation:

A tautology is a statement that is true for every assignment of truth values to its simple components.

a) A truth table shows how the truth or falsity of a compound statement depends on the truth or falsity of the simple statements from which it's constructed.

We have the statement
(\lnot q \land(p\lor p))\rightarrow \lnot q, which is compound by these statements:


  • \lnot q

  • p\lor p

  • \lnot q \land(p\lor p)

and we are going to use these simple statements to build the truth table.

The last column contains only true values. Therefore, the statement is a tautology.

b) We are going to use the table of logical equivalences as follows:


(\lnot q \land(p\lor p))\rightarrow \lnot q \equiv


\equiv \lnot(\lnot q \land(p\lor p)) \lor \lnot q by the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.


\equiv \lnot(\lnot q) \lor \lnot(p\lor p) \lor \lnot q by De Morgan's Law


\equiv q \lor \lnot(p\lor p) \lor \lnot q by the Double negation law


\equiv q \lor \lnot p \lor \lnot q by the Idempotent law


\equiv (q \lor \lnot q)\lor \lnot p by Associative law


\equiv T\lor \lnot p by Negation law


\equiv T by Domination law

Show that (-91(pvp)) +n is a tautology (i.e. (91(pvp)) +7=T). (a) (3 points) Show-example-1
Show that (-91(pvp)) +n is a tautology (i.e. (91(pvp)) +7=T). (a) (3 points) Show-example-2
User RPL
by
4.5k points