Question

Read Ahmad's argument in favor of changing the minimum

driving age from 16 to 15.
What is the best evaluation of Ahmad's reasoning?
It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning.
It is logical because it stays on topic.
It is illogical because it shows no bias.
It is logical because it gives true statistics
Every year, millions of teenagers look forward to the freedom
of earning their driver's license. It has been proven over time
that teenagers are fully responsible by the time they are 15,
and making teens wait until they are 16 to obtain a driver's
license is wrong. Many teenagers play sports, work jobs,
and have an active social life when they are 15. It would be
beneficial to the functioning of society if these people were
able to independently drive themselves around. Parents
agree, too. Most people believe that the streets would be
safer if the minimum driving age were reduced to 15.

Answer 1

it is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning

Answer 2

The best evaluation of Ahmad's reasoning is that It is illogical because it relies on faulty reasoning.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument that Ahmad is presenting does not have enough evident or clear supportive details as a real statistic or any kind of reference in studies or social analysis in order to claim it as a logical argument, it is based in a conclusion made with little information and perhaps not confirmed information about the topic.