57.4k views
5 votes
Communicate Mathematical Ideas Irrational numbers can never be precisely represented in decimal form. Why is this? 20 Unit1

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

An irrational number can never be represented precisely in decimal form.

Explanation:

A number can be precisely represented in decimal form if you can give a rule for the construction of its decimal part,

for example:

2.246973973973973... (an infinite tail of 973's repeated over and over)

7.35 (a tail of zeroes)

If this the case, then the number is a RATIONAL NUMBER, i.e, the QUOTIENT OF TWO INTEGERS.

Let's show this for the first example and then a way to show the general situation will arise naturally.

Suppose N = 2.246973973973...

You can always multiply by a suitable power of 10 until you get a number with only the repeated chain in the tail

for example:

1)
N.10^3=2246.973973973...

but also

2)
N.10^6=2246973.973973...

Subtracting 1) from 2) we get


N.10^6-N.10^3=2246973.973973973... - 2246.973973973...

Now, the infinite tail disappears


N.10^6-N.10^3=2246973 - 2246=226747

But


N.10^6-N.10^3=N.(10^6-10^3)=N.(1000000-1000)=999000.N

We have then

999000.N=226747

and


N=(226747)/(999000)

We do not need to simplify this fraction, because we only wanted to show that N is a quotient of two integers.

We arrive then to the following conclusion:

If an irrational number could be represented precisely in decimal form, then it would have to be the quotient of two integers, which is a contradiction.

So, an irrational number can never be represented precisely in decimal form.

User Adjoa
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories