Answer:
Ans. B) 22 m/s (the closest to what I have which was 20.16 m/s)
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, well, first, we have to find the equations for both, the driver and the van. The first one is moving with constant acceleration (a=-2m/s^2) and the van has no acceletation. Let´s write down both formulas so we can solve this problem.
![X(van)=5.65t+154](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/vgnzbp5ir2k0r4nlcoxltw1ym5yi7fg9qs.png)
![X(driver)=34.4t+((-2)t^(2) )/(2)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/9qw7i4u705rtoh3skjacjij7jj9mnfhhps.png)
or by rearanging the drivers equation.
![X(driver)=34.4t+t^(2)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/wfq4e6iekdmk94u3zkr9p1yvwd6zm314tk.png)
Now that we have this, let´s equal both equations so we can tell the moment in which both cars crashed.
![X(van)=X(driver)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/w2049ogmilwohormdh0zldj0809o66a3tl.png)
![5.65t+154=34.4t-t^(2)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/b6rhdde1l53cryprbl8q8na0uzvvesupgm.png)
![0=t^(2) -(34.4-5.65)t+154](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/s936lyfq5ea0qu1fzotuzrj9vnbt2fiuhf.png)
![0=t^(2) -28.75t+154](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/1eg0x02q2j3oh3huzvy7xasamn54g0aejc.png)
To solve this equation we use the following formulas
![t=\frac{-b +\sqrt{b^(2)-4ac } }{2a}](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/jh055nu0zgwamv4m4n4k4422d88d5im1iu.png)
![t=\frac{-b +\sqrt{b^(2)-4ac } }{2a}](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/jh055nu0zgwamv4m4n4k4422d88d5im1iu.png)
Where a=1; b=-28.75; c=154
So we get:
![t=\frac{28.75 +\sqrt{(-28.75)^(2)-4(1)(154) } }{2(1)}=21.63s](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/aqpyqedlmlq5xwve7jteyut2e7i1hjr2fr.png)
![t=\frac{28.75 -\sqrt{(-28.75)^(2)-4(1)(154) } }{2(1)}=7.12s](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/vdawtibavr3i9ne22j6enzk69lkwljr5ey.png)
At this point, both answers could seem possible, but let´s find the speed of the driver and see if one of them seems ilogic.
}
![V(driver)=34.4(m)/(s) -2(m)/(s^(2) ) *(7.12s)=20.16(m)/(s)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/b1nf3wtfukezdcrm0908pq3wm4vln3huuv.png)
![V(driver)=34.4(m)/(s) -2(m)/(s^(2) ) *(21.63s)=-8.86(m)/(s)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/physics/college/gkeapryfxzz7vi3eueyjetoft8oldkzhih.png)
This means that 21.63s will outcome into a negative speed, for that reason we will not use the value of 21.63s, we use 7.12s and if so, the speed of the driver when he/she hits the van is 20.16m/s, which is closer to answer A).
Best of luck