Answer:
2.
Explanation:
1. Recall the definition of one-to-one function. We say that
is one-to-one if and only if the equality
implies that
.
First example:
.
We start with
.
In the above equalities, the central one, making cross products, is equivalent to
.
Then,
. Now, cancelling identical terms we get
which is equivalent to
. Thus, simplifying the factor 6, we get
. Therefore, the function is one-to-one.
Second example:
.
We try to follow the same reasoning. We start with
.
Now, we elevate both members to the square (recall that both expressions are positive, so there is no problem with squaring) and obtain:
. We eliminate the 9's and we get
. Simplifying the 5's, we finally obtain that
. Therefore the function is one-to-one.
Third example.
.
This example is different from the previous ones. Recall that we prove that a function is not one-to-one if we find two different numbers
such that
.
Then, notice that if we take
and
we get that
and
.
Then, this function is not one-to-one.
Fourth example:
.
As the first two cases. Consider
. Then, simplify the factor 1/2, and we get
.
Now, let us transform the previous equality into
. This expression can be factored:
. Thus,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddc1b/ddc1b64370ae3a87aebfa46701b8e167c9b541e8" alt="0=(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)"
Notice that the above equality is possible if and only if
or
. But the second possibility is impossible (you can check it using the general formula for second degree equations), thus, necessarily
which is equivalent to
. Therefore, the function is one-to-one.
Fifth example:
.
First, notice that the polynomial
can be factored as
.
From here is not difficult to deduce that
and consequently the function is not one-to-one.
2. As we are looking for the inverse function
of
is a better idea to use the following notation:
,
instead of
.
Notice that, with this notation we are saying that
depends on
. Now, when we are looking for the inverse function we will try to write the variable
in terms of
. With this idea, the first step is to move the 8 in the right hand side to the left hand side, so:
.
Recall that we need to isolated the variable
, so we must ‘‘eliminate’’ the cubic root. In order to do this we take cubic powers in both side of the above equality. Then,
.
Finally, we take the 2 to the left hand side and we get
.
Thus, the inverse function is
.
Notice that if we do
we get
.