Answer: The authors had opposing views. 2. Yes and no. In the text, "The Case for Mars" by Alexander Fisher, the text talks about how humans going to Mars would be better because robots take longer to examine Mars and the robots could break. The text, "Mars- A Waste of Time and Money" by Juniper Springs talks about how robots are just as compatible as humans to be going to Mars. The two authors also used the topic of one's health as persuasion. Juniper Springs argued that the radiation levels could have long term effects on people who went to Mars while Alexander Fisher argued that the radiation levels weren't immediately lethal. In short, the two authors both used the topic of robots going to Mars and one's health as reasons for their opinions. 3. The authors supported their views in similar ways. 4. Alexander Fisher focused more on emotion and appeals in his writing. And Juniper Springs focused more on logic in his writing.
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helped. I had this assignment not too long ago.