Final answer:
Using only selective parts of a quotation that bolster your points can result in an unconvincing argument; a fair and objective paper should balance quotations with original thought, analysis, and acknowledgment of counterclaims.
Step-by-step explanation:
Including only the part of a quotation that supports your points rather than presenting a balanced perspective often makes your argument unconvincing. It is essential for a paper to demonstrate a fair balance of source information, analysis, synthesis, and original thought. An objective treatment of the subject would require quotations to function as support, meticulously edited to reveal their main points, along with a conscientious effort to address counterclaims and a consistent awareness of the audience's language use and background information.
It is crucial to use quotations intentionally; they should highlight specific wording or concepts for deeper analysis rather than replace the writer's original ideas or voice. Incorporating too much quoted material without sufficient original analysis can overwhelm your voice with that of secondary sources, diluting the unique perspective you are meant to provide. Therefore, effective arguing in an academic context means contributing mainly your own ideas while strategically using quotations to complement and reinforce your viewpoint.