Question

PLZZZ help!!(50pts)

1Majority Opinion: It is said that we are dealing here with the case of imprisonment of a citizen
2in a concentration camp solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning
3his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States. Our task would be simple, our duty
4clear, were this a case involving the imprisonment of a loyal citizen in a concentration camp
5because of racial prejudice. Regardless of the true nature of the assembly and relocation centers
6and we deem it unjustifiable to call them concentration camps with all the ugly connotations
7that term implies -- we are dealing specifically with nothing but an exclusion order. To cast this
8case into outlines of racial prejudice, without reference to the real military dangers which were
9presented, merely confuses the issue. Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area
10because of hostility to him or his race. He was excluded because we are at war with the
11Japanese Empire, because the properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our
12West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures, because they decided that the
13military urgency of the situation demanded that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be segregated
14from the West Coast temporarily, and finally, because Congress, reposing its confidence in this
15time of war in our military leaders -- as inevitably it must -- determined that they should have
16the power to do just this. There was evidence of disloyalty on the part of some, the military
17authorities considered that the need for action was great, and time was short. We cannot -- by
18availing ourselves of the calm perspective of hindsight -- now say that at that time these actions
19were unjustified. Affirmed.




1. The Court argues that the case isn’t about racial prejudice but rather is about legitimate military concerns. What were those military concerns? (lines 7-11)

2. Do you agree with the Majority Opinion that racial prejudice did not play a role in the U.S. government’s treatment of Japanese Americans during World War II? Explain your reasoning.

Answer 1

1. The key military concern referenced by the Court was that "properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast." The military authorities feared that Japanese Americans would give information to the Japanese or might themselves engage in attacks against US military installations.

2. I do not agree with the majority opinion that racial prejudice did not play a role in the US government's treatment of Japanese Americans. There was definitely prejudice, which means pre-judging or judging in advance. The authorities were able to force any and all persons of Japanese ancestry into internment camps, without presenting any evidence that they as individuals had, in fact, done anything to warrant such action against them. It had been generic, stereotyped suspicion of anyone of Japanese heritage that prompted the government to restrict the civil liberties of Japanese Americans. President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066 (February 1942), which allowed the Secretary of War to designate certain areas as military zones, set the stage for the mass relocation of Japanese-ancestry persons to internment camps. By June of 1942, over 100,000 Japanese Americans were sent to such internment camps. That was a rush to judgement against thousands of persons without due process of law, to which they were entitled under the US Constitution.