88.5k views
4 votes
A geometry teacher asked Radric to define "parallel lines." Radric said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. Is Radric's definition valid?

User Nbryans
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

Radric answer is Right.

Explanation:

  • Radric said that the parallel lines are the lines in a plane that do not have any points in common.
  • He is right as he is talking about the lines in a plane i.e the line are not intersecting each other even till infinity .
  • It is not possible for two non-parallel lines not intersect each other in a plane at any point. Even, if there is a small deviation in the two lines they will intersect at some point in the plane.

So the Radric is right and his answer is valid.

User Jorilallo
by
8.8k points
3 votes

Answer: The answer is Yes.

Step-by-step explanation: Given in the question that Radric was asked to define "parallel lines" and he said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. We are to decide whether Radric's definition is valid or not.

Parallel lines are defined as lines in a plane which never meets or any two lines in a plane which do not intersect each other at any point are called parallel.

Thus, Radric's definition is valid.

User Giaour
by
8.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories