88.5k views
4 votes
A geometry teacher asked Radric to define "parallel lines." Radric said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. Is Radric's definition valid?

User Nbryans
by
7.2k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

Radric answer is Right.

Explanation:

  • Radric said that the parallel lines are the lines in a plane that do not have any points in common.
  • He is right as he is talking about the lines in a plane i.e the line are not intersecting each other even till infinity .
  • It is not possible for two non-parallel lines not intersect each other in a plane at any point. Even, if there is a small deviation in the two lines they will intersect at some point in the plane.

So the Radric is right and his answer is valid.

User Jorilallo
by
7.9k points
3 votes

Answer: The answer is Yes.

Step-by-step explanation: Given in the question that Radric was asked to define "parallel lines" and he said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. We are to decide whether Radric's definition is valid or not.

Parallel lines are defined as lines in a plane which never meets or any two lines in a plane which do not intersect each other at any point are called parallel.

Thus, Radric's definition is valid.

User Giaour
by
7.3k points