Answer:
Statement 2.: QK/KL=16/40; PK/MK=26/65
Statement 3.: QK/KL=2/5=PK/MK
Reason 4: Vertical angles
Reason 5: SAS
Explanation:
Statement 2:
The smaller of the sides adjacent to <PKQ (QK=16) in triangle PKQ is corresponding with the smaller of the sides adjacent to <MKL (KL=40) in triangle MKL.
The larger of the sides adjacent to <PKQ (PK=26) in triangle PKQ is corresponding with the larger of the sides adjacent to <MKL (MK=65) in triangle MKL.
Ratio of the corresponding sides:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/319af/319afc4aa39c57b7d15a57c90f7202e1724b0d0f" alt="(QK)/(KL)=(16)/(40)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20bfc/20bfcbe91b2404b279ff67fa4610687e4808d5e8" alt="(PK)/(MK)=(26)/(65)"
Statement 3. Simplifying ratios:
Dividing the numerator and denominator by 8:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b309c/b309cd2c04622aa49f78ef908b3d0337c83613f7" alt="(QK)/(KL)=((16)/(8))/((40)/(8))\\ (QK)/(KL)=(2)/(5)"
Dividing the numerator and denominator by 13:
Reason 4: <MKL is conguent with <PKQ because they are vertical angles (angles opposite by the vertex)
Reason 5: The two triangles (∆QPK y ∆LMK) have a congruent angle (<MKL with <PKQ) and the corresponding sides including this angle proportionals (QK/KL=2/5=PK/MK), then the two triangles (∆QPK y ∆LMK) are similar. This case is SAS.