Final answer:
The price Indians had to pay for the increased stability of British rule included economic burdens from forced cultivation of cash crops, higher taxes, and infrastructural projects benefiting the British more than the locals, along with societal tensions from the British indirect rule.
Step-by-step explanation:
The increased stability of British rule in India came at a considerable cost to the Indian people. The British imposition of policies centered on strengthening their own economic interests resulted in several direct and indirect economic burdens for Indians. Among these were forcing Indian farmers to grow cash crops such as cotton and tea instead of food crops, which served British factories and households. High excise taxes on Indian textiles made English fabrics more economical for Indians, undermining local industries. Furthermore, the British officials extracted high taxes to pay for their soldiers and officials, as well as infrastructure projects like railroads and telegraph lines, primarily benefiting the colonizers.
In addition to economic impacts, the system of indirect rule maintained by the British East India Company coerced Indian elites into supporting British policies, ensuring a steady flow of taxes and soldiers. Resistance to British rule did emerge, with many communities divided between cooperation and rebellion, and within the resistance, between violent and peaceful methods. Altogether, the British policies during their rule led to significant exploitation and socioeconomic strain within Indian society, fostering an environment of tension and resistance where the colonized paid dearly for the so-called stability provided by the colonizers.