Answer:
Henry David Thoreau, in his essay by the title of "Civil Disobedience," inserts many rhetorical questions that are meant to make the audience think when it comes to situations requiring deep thought on ethical and moral standards. In Thoreau's point of view, there is indeed a clear distinction between causing something bad to happen and allowing that same thing to happen. These are the kinds of rhetorical questions that Thoreau asks in his essay to make his point; if someone allows injustice to simply happen, there can be many ways to interpret this situation. If someone decides not to intervene, they may be considering themselves and plans they may have that would have been drawn askew had they interfered. Still, the question remains whether or not their personal wellbeing excuses standing by and allowing injustices to happen, which is precisely the kind of thing that Thoreau asks in his essay, "Civil Disobedience".
Step-by-step explanation:
Please put your answer in your own words :)