24.7k views
0 votes
In at least 150 words, discuss why Thoreau includes rhetorical questions in "Civil Disobedience." Use details from the passage to support your answer.

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

Henry David Thoreau, in his essay by the title of "Civil Disobedience," inserts many rhetorical questions that are meant to make the audience think when it comes to situations requiring deep thought on ethical and moral standards. In Thoreau's point of view, there is indeed a clear distinction between causing something bad to happen and allowing that same thing to happen. These are the kinds of rhetorical questions that Thoreau asks in his essay to make his point; if someone allows injustice to simply happen, there can be many ways to interpret this situation. If someone decides not to intervene, they may be considering themselves and plans they may have that would have been drawn askew had they interfered. Still, the question remains whether or not their personal wellbeing excuses standing by and allowing injustices to happen, which is precisely the kind of thing that Thoreau asks in his essay, "Civil Disobedience".

Step-by-step explanation:

Please put your answer in your own words :)

User Teknova
by
5.1k points
7 votes

Thoreau sees a moral distinction between failing to prevent an injustice and actually causing an injustice. Consider an example. Thoreau argues that the United States' invasion of Mexico is immoral and that Americans who support the government with their person (as soldiers) or property (through taxes) are complicit in that injustice. He would further say that a person should go to jail rather than be responsible for that invasion. However, imagine a case in which another country was invading Mexico, but that by offering himself up as some sort of hostage and allowing himself to be imprisoned, he could stop that invasion. Thoreau would argue that while it would be perfectly moral to go to jail in this case, he would not be required to do so. As a human being, he may legitimately have other ends or goals that require him to be out of jail. It is not his job to promote the best world possible by any means necessary. All that can be asked of a person is that he not dirty his own hands with injustice. Once this requirement is fulfilled, each individual should decide for himself what to do with his life. This distinction is rooted in Thoreau's belief that individuals should look inward for how they should live their lives. A person's primary duty is to be true to himself--to act with integrity and to pursue personal moral goals.

User DennisLi
by
5.6k points