105k views
3 votes
Sunshine State Free Press

Letter from the Editor

Many Floridians are concerned about gun control. Some people believe that limiting access to firearms may make the nation safer. Others believe that this goes against their rights as Americans. What about a compromise? Keep all firearms, but add a new, large tax on ammunition.

Which change to the article would show bias in favor of one side of the gun-control debate?

"It is important that we reach a compromise!"
"Many Floridians think that the gun-control issue is important to address."
"Most people know that limiting access to firearms will make the nation safer."
"Others believe that this goes against their constitutional rights as Americans."

User Joe Hanink
by
4.8k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

Answer is D, The tax may unfairly limit the right to bear arms, protected by the Second Amendment. Hope this helps :)

Step-by-step explanation:

User Fozoglu
by
5.7k points
3 votes

C) Most people know that limited access to firearms would make the nation safer.

The change to the article that would show bias in favor of one side of the gun-control debate is “Most people know that limited access to firearms would make the nation safer.”

User NetSquirrel
by
4.8k points