123k views
2 votes
Edgar said 3/5 is equivalent to 18/32. Check his work by making a
table of equivalent ratios.

Edgar said 3/5 is equivalent to 18/32. Check his work by making a table of equivalent-example-1

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

In a nutshell,
(3)/(5) is not equivalent to
(18)/(32).

Explanation:

Now we proceed to demonstrate that Edgar's statement is false:

1)
(3)/(5) Given

2)
(3)/(5) * (2)/(2) Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse

3)
(6)/(10)
(a)/(b)* (c)/(d) = (a\cdot b)/(c\cdot d)

4)
(6)/(10)* (3)/(3) Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse

5)
(18)/(30)
(a)/(b)* (c)/(d) = (a\cdot b)/(c\cdot d)/Result

In a nutshell,
(3)/(5) is not equivalent to
(18)/(32).

User Iasksillyquestions
by
7.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories