123k views
2 votes
Edgar said 3/5 is equivalent to 18/32. Check his work by making a
table of equivalent ratios.

Edgar said 3/5 is equivalent to 18/32. Check his work by making a table of equivalent-example-1

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

In a nutshell,
(3)/(5) is not equivalent to
(18)/(32).

Explanation:

Now we proceed to demonstrate that Edgar's statement is false:

1)
(3)/(5) Given

2)
(3)/(5) * (2)/(2) Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse

3)
(6)/(10)
(a)/(b)* (c)/(d) = (a\cdot b)/(c\cdot d)

4)
(6)/(10)* (3)/(3) Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse

5)
(18)/(30)
(a)/(b)* (c)/(d) = (a\cdot b)/(c\cdot d)/Result

In a nutshell,
(3)/(5) is not equivalent to
(18)/(32).

User Iasksillyquestions
by
6.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.