Question

Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." How did this statement inform the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech?

Answer 1

Vwalaaa Enjoy

Step-by-step explanation:

In a majority judgment for the Supreme Court, Justice Holmes once wrote, "During wartime, comments tolerated in peacetime can be penalized." The Supreme Court's following rulings on free speech were influenced by this declaration, which held that people cannot criticize the government or express opinions that could jeopardize national security during times of war. Thus, in this instance, the right to free speech may be restricted while a war is in progress.

There have been instances in the past where espionage activities may have jeopardized the war's plan. Because of this, the federal government must exercise caution when disseminating information during times of war.

Answer 2

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Supreme Court Justice Holmes once included this statement in a majority opinion: "During wartime, utterances tolerable in peacetime can be punished." This statement informed the Supreme Court's later decisions on freedom of speech in that in times of war, citizens are not allowed to express comments or critics that could compromise the national security of the country. So in this case, freedom of speech could be suppressed during the time of war.

In the past, there had been incidents that could have compromised the strategy of the war due to some espionage activities. That is why the federal government has to be cautious with the information that is shared during war times.