136k views
5 votes
Which one of these relationships is different than the other three? Explain how you know. Hint: Find all

of the constants of proportionality.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

Graph 2 has a different constant of proportionality

Explanation:

See attachment for graphs

To calculate the constant of proportionality, we simply determine the slope of each graph using


m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)

Where x's and y's are corresponding values of x and y

Graph 1:


(x_1,y_1) = (0,0)


(x_2,y_2) = (0.8,4)

Substitute these values in:
m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)


m = (4 - 0)/(0.8 - 0)


m = (4)/(0.8)


m = 5

Graph 2:


(x_1,y_1) = (0,0)


(x_2,y_2) = (10,55)

Substitute these values in:
m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)


m = (55 - 0)/(10 - 0)


m = (55)/(10)


m = 5.5

Graph 3:


(x_1,y_1) = (0,0)


(x_2,y_2) = (4,20)

Substitute these values in:
m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)


m = (20 - 0)/(4 - 0)


m = (20)/(4)


m = 5

Graph 4:


(x_1,y_1) = (0,0)


(x_2,y_2) = (10,50)

Substitute these values in:
m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)


m = (50 - 0)/(10 - 0)


m = (50)/(10)


m = 5

From the calculations above, graph 2 has a different constant of proportionality of 5.5 while others have 5 as their constant of proportionality

Which one of these relationships is different than the other three? Explain how you-example-1
User Urdesh Kumar
by
8.2k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories