136k views
5 votes
Which one of these relationships is different than the other three? Explain how you know. Hint: Find all

of the constants of proportionality.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

Graph 2 has a different constant of proportionality

Explanation:

See attachment for graphs

To calculate the constant of proportionality, we simply determine the slope of each graph using


m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)

Where x's and y's are corresponding values of x and y

Graph 1:


(x_1,y_1) = (0,0)


(x_2,y_2) = (0.8,4)

Substitute these values in:
m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)


m = (4 - 0)/(0.8 - 0)


m = (4)/(0.8)


m = 5

Graph 2:


(x_1,y_1) = (0,0)


(x_2,y_2) = (10,55)

Substitute these values in:
m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)


m = (55 - 0)/(10 - 0)


m = (55)/(10)


m = 5.5

Graph 3:


(x_1,y_1) = (0,0)


(x_2,y_2) = (4,20)

Substitute these values in:
m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)


m = (20 - 0)/(4 - 0)


m = (20)/(4)


m = 5

Graph 4:


(x_1,y_1) = (0,0)


(x_2,y_2) = (10,50)

Substitute these values in:
m = (y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)


m = (50 - 0)/(10 - 0)


m = (50)/(10)


m = 5

From the calculations above, graph 2 has a different constant of proportionality of 5.5 while others have 5 as their constant of proportionality

Which one of these relationships is different than the other three? Explain how you-example-1
User Urdesh Kumar
by
6.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.