43.2k views
5 votes
in a counterargument to Mr. Grove's position, Tim Kane wrote in Forbes that despite the number of manufacturing jobs being 50 percent below the peak in 1979, this is not a big problem for the economy because U.S. industrial production numbers are actually near record highs. Why else did Mr. Kane think the focus on small business startups is appropriate, and so did not agree with Mr. Grove

User Jayantha
by
6.0k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Answer:

The answer is "Option B".

Step-by-step explanation:

please find the complete question in the given attached file.

In this opinion, Tim Kane believed that its economy can not be badly affected by low manufacturing jobs in 1979, provided, in which an American industrial production had strong potential growth. Their view also opposes whatever Mr. Grove said of lower US employment particularly cos of increased production figures. Their opinion disputes as much as the American.

In Forbes, they wrote that All our industrial production is breaking records with increasing efficiency, despite a low number of industrial workers. Including Mr. grove, he favors beginning for small businesses. It was mainly due to the big advantage of smaller companies or the production of employment.

in a counterargument to Mr. Grove's position, Tim Kane wrote in Forbes that despite-example-1
User Akaliza
by
5.4k points