Question

Gamma rays are often used to kill microorganisms in food, in an attempt to make the food safer. Some people contend that this irradiated

food is actually less safe to eat. Which, if true, would most effectively dispute their idea? (1 point)
a
Irradiated food only emits alpha particles, which are harmless.
Ob
Irradiated food is shown to not be radioactive.
C
Irradiated food only contributes to background radiation.
Irradiated food has molecules that undergo transmutation,
Od

Answer 1

b . Irradiated food is shown to not be radioactive.

Step-by-step explanation:

If it can be proven that irradiated food is not radioactive, then it will effective dispute the idea that irradiated food are less safe to eat.

• An irradiated food is one in which ionizing radiations have been employed to improve food quality.
• Thus, bacteria and other food spoilers can be exterminated from the food.
• Most irradiated food do not contain radiation and are fit for consumption.

If it can be proven, that this is true, then it will challenge the idea that irradiated foods are not safe.