Answer:
issue: “gerrymandering” and a the removal of Bear’s Ears being removed via a white council vote despite Native American locals opposing this.
solution: a case brought to the court in the racial “gerrymandering” that claimed the decision made by white officials completely overturned the voice of their rival political party
Step-by-step explanation:
most of the population in Utah is reserved to Native Americans with Trabajo cultural influences. the issue lies in the “gerrymandering” or the act of one political party overturning the other due conflicts because of things like race, slander, or distaste towards the opposing party. the removal of Bear’s Ears was opposed by the Native Americans, as the majority vote was to preserve such. however, the white council of Utah instead called the shots and agreed to the removal of this monument. the Native Americans brought the case to the court where they filed a violation to the Voting Rights Act of 1976, where they won the case. as a result, a Native American council was elected as representatives for the state of Utah, with the Bear’s Ears remaining under protection. this is relevant because in modern-day society racism is tragically still an issue, where the basic human rights of colored people are wiped due to their skin color. the slander and objectifications towards their motives in voting, in the workplace, and in life as a whole are frowned down upon and disregarded as practically meaningless. some parties feel as if colored individuals shouldn’t have the right to vote as they are deemed inferior by said party. the voting act preserves this overthrow and engages colored people to share their voice and outlook upon the nation and its government.