Question

The reader can infer from the Article that __________.

Press enter to interact with the item, and press tab button or down arrow until reaching the Submit button once the item is selectedAIt is unlikely that the decision in the 1994 McDonald's case has had any influence on the way judges have ruled in similar cases.
BIt is unlikely that the judge will side in Deanna Salas-Solano's favor in the 2017 case against Starbucks since there was a dog in the car.
CIn deciding the May 2017 case against Starbucks, the judge probably did not consider the testimony from a Starbucks employee who cited 80 complaints per month about lids leaking and popping off.
DIn the 1994 case against McDonald's, the judge probably held McDonald's responsible, in part because officials admitted that the coffee was too hot to drink when it was handed to the plaintiff.

Answer 1

when the drink was too hot the plantiff got mad and it was leaking

Step-by-step explanation: