Final answer:
Governor E. W. Marland faced opposition from state politics while trying to implement New Deal programs in Oklahoma. This reflected a broader debate on federalism during the time of the New Deal, with the Supreme Court initially ruling against it and tensions existing between federal initiatives and state autonomy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Governor E. W. Marland struggled with opposition from state politics to implement New Deal programs in Oklahoma. Despite President Franklin D. Roosevelt's legislative efforts to help the country recover from the Great Depression through the New Deal, there was significant debate about federalism and the role of the federal government in state matters. The Supreme Court initially struck down key components of the New Deal, calling them unconstitutional. Additionally, there were clashes between organized labor, industry, and authority during this period, which highlighted the systemic issues that the New Deal didn't fully address.
The tension between federal initiatives and state autonomy was a recurring theme in American politics, with figures like Reagan encountering obstacles to implementing federal programs at the state level due to concerns about funding and effectiveness. Even well-respected governors like Alf Landon had mixed feelings about the extent of federal intervention, advocating for a balance that would support private industry while benefiting from New Deal policies.