158,068 views
14 votes
14 votes
PLSS HELPP!!! 100 POINTSS!! write a three-paragraph mini essay on the following prompt. Each paragraph must be from 5 to 7 sentences. Include one example of a simile, a metaphor, and a hyperbole that you circle. Also, underline your thesis statement.

Prompt: Do you think Julius Caesar in the play, “Julius Caesar” should have been murdered, and do you think he was too ambitious? Provide evidence from the play to support your answer.

User Qinjie
by
2.8k points

1 Answer

5 votes
5 votes

Answer:

The conflict between Cesar and his supporters against his conspirators occurs due to the discrepancy of vision, in relation to Cesar, that the conspirators and supporters have. While the conspirators frame Cesar as a manipulator, dangerous and hungry for power; supporters see him as a great leader and a thoughtful and efficient ruler. This duality can be seen in two moments, first in Act I, Scene II when Cassius tries to convince Brutus to stop supporting Cesar, take the reins of his own life and become a conspirator. This can also be seen in Act V, Scene I, when Cassius asks Brutus to not only stop supporting Cesar, but help murder him. In both cases, Brutus is confused whether or not he should support Cesar.

This confusion of Brutus is passed on to the reader, since Cesar has, in fact, great qualities and defects. This confusion is only broken by the positioning of Marco Antonio, who is extremely faithful to Caesar and presents all the hypocrisy of the conspirators to conspire and kill Cesar by showing that all of Caesar's acts were in favor of the Roman people.

"The Tragedie of Julius Caesar" was written by William Shakespeare and tells how the conspiracy that ended the life of Julio Cesar, the Roman dictator, was established, as well as tells the results and consequences of that assassination.

Step-by-step explanation:

I dont know i just found it and i think its right

User PepeFloyd
by
2.6k points