171k views
3 votes
Which detail is relevant for an argument to make drivers who run through red lights pay a fee? Even though everyone knows that going through red lights is illegal, they do it anyway. The current fines, which are being used to maintain roads, are generating a lot of money for the city. People do not feel safe on the street because they know drivers are not stopping at red lights. The current fines are not high enough to discourage drivers from going through red lights.

User Ivnhal
by
3.7k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

D) The current fines are not high enough to discourage drivers from going through red lights.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Harleypig
by
4.2k points
7 votes

The correct answer is D) The current fines are not high enough to discourage drivers from going through red lights.

The detail that is relevant for an argument to make drivers who run through red lights pay a fee is "The current fines are not high enough to discourage drivers from going through red lights."

It is relevant because although already exists a fee for drivers who run through red lights, it is not so high because they still doing that and it is against the law and the worst part is that they can cause a fatal accident. So this is very dangerous and people should take this seriously.

That is why it is important that penalties should be harsher in order to force people to stop doing this. They are risking their lives and other people's lives.

User Kevin Tianyu Xu
by
4.3k points