Final answer:
Fielding's attitude toward the poor is complex and empathetic, advocating for a broader understanding of poverty. He identifies with the poor due to his personal circumstances and seems to hope for their coexistence with the rich rather than any form of conflict or vengeance.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the textual references provided, Fielding's attitude toward the poor can be interpreted through multiple lenses. He demonstrates a recognition of different categories of poverty: the destitute, laborers, the genteel poor, and those who are spiritually rich yet materially poor. Fielding's concept of poverty seems imbued with a combination of identification with the poor due to his personal circumstances and a nuanced understanding of the complexity of poverty.
Fielding, alongside Wordsworth, advocated for a broader definition of poverty that considers the different circumstances and challenges that individuals face. This broader definition aligns more closely with the idea that Fielding hopes the poor can learn to coexist with the rich. Fielding and Wordsworth both identify with the poor to an extent and see their struggles reflected in those around them. There doesn't seem to be an explicit desire for an uprising or for the rich to be punished for the suffering of the poor, but rather an acknowledgment of the different facets of poverty and a call to understand and address them.