Question

Select THREE facts about the Baker v. Carr Supreme Court case.

1. Carr was charged with redistricting the state to favor his political party.

2. The case changed reapportionment of how people are represented throughout America.

3. The case expanded judicial review down to the county court level.

4. Baker argued that residents of his district were not receiving equal protection of the laws.

5. The case was an early example of judicial activism.

6. Tennessee argued that legislative redistricting was a political question that needed to be resolved by the legislative branch.

Answer 1

Baker argued that residents of his district were not receiving equal protection of the laws.

Tennessee argued that legislative redistricting was a political question that needed to be resolved by the legislative branch.

The case changed reapportionment of how people are represented throughout America.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answered this question and got 100% :)