If f¹ is supposed to say f⁻¹ : rewrite f(4x + 5) as an "obvious" function of 4x + 5, then replace 4x + 5 with x. By "obvious", I mean make it clear how 4x + 5 is the argument to f.
Then swapping out 4x + 5 for x gives
The inverse of f(x), if it exists, is a function f⁻¹(x) such that
Evaluate f at f⁻¹ and solve for f⁻¹ :
If f¹ instead means f' (as in the first derivative of f) : earlier we found f(x) = 3x + 3, and differentiating this is trivial.