182k views
2 votes
Can you help me Number 1 and 2 and 3 pls

Can you help me Number 1 and 2 and 3 pls-example-1
User Shameem
by
4.7k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

Scientific law vs. theory and facts. A hypothesis is a limited explanation of a phenomenon; a scientific theory is an in-depth explanation of the observed phenomenon.

they are difference because the law

Step-by-step explanation:

User Anqit
by
6.0k points
2 votes

Answer:

  1. Scientific law vs. theory and facts. ... A hypothesis is a limited explanation of a phenomenon; a scientific theory is an in-depth explanation of the observed phenomenon. A law is a statement about an observed phenomenon or a unifying concept, according to Kennesaw State University.
  2. I do not know sorry
  3. They have to make sure they are true and, a theory does not have to be accurate to serve this purpose. Even an inaccurate theory can generate new and interesting research questions. Of course, if the theory is inaccurate, the answers to the new questions will tend to be inconsistent with the theory.

Step-by-step explanation:

Can I get crowned? Or thanked?

User Siusiulala
by
6.2k points