Final answer:
The provisions of the Treaty of Versailles, including the 'war guilt' clause and military restrictions, were probably inserted to prevent future German aggression, ensure reparations, and restructure European power. However, they indirectly facilitated the rise of the Nazi party by causing economic turmoil and resentment in Germany, and the exclusion of a racial equality clause reflected the era's racial prejudices.
Step-by-step explanation:
The clauses inserted into the Treaty of Versailles were likely designed to serve several purposes. Firstly, the 'war guilt' clause, which probably aimed to provide a moral and legal basis for the heavy reparations demanded from Germany, also had the effect of destabilizing the German state both economically and politically. Secondly, the military restrictions were intended to ensure that Germany would not pose a future threat to European peace and stability. Thirdly, the territorial adjustments and colonial reallocations sought to weaken Germany's position further, while compensating the Allies for their losses and restructuring the balance of power in Europe and beyond.
However, these clauses would go on to contribute significantly to the rise of discontent in Germany, eventually aiding in the rise of the Nazi party and sparking World War II. They engendered a sense of humiliation and resentment among the German populace and placed an unsustainable financial burden on the country, which struggled to cope with the hyperinflation and economic turmoil that followed. In addition, allied enforcement of the treaty was inconsistent, leading further to the breakdown of the treaty’s provisions and setting the stage for the failure of appeasement policies against Hitler's aggression.
One significant aspect not directly related to Germany but of note was the absence of a racial equality clause, denied mainly due to opposition from countries like the United States and Australia, reflecting the racial prejudices of the time, despite some support for it among the powers. This omission highlighted the limited scope of the treaty in addressing broader issues of racial discrimination and international relations.