79.1k views
3 votes
One argument in response to the "Commons" idea is that private land ownership will prevent a "tragedy" from happening. Based on the article, do you agree or disagree? Why?

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer: agree

Step-by-step explanation:

The common argument which is based on shared assets and the behavior of each individuals.

When the land ownership becomes private a tragedy is avoided as each individual treats the land with care and caution, unlike when it’s a common( shared) where they all don’t care what happens to the land or it’s aftermath so far they all gain personally. So yes when it’s a private land then and then do they truly prevent any tragedy associated with common to happen.

User LoveTW
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories