22.3k views
2 votes
Credibility is essentially the believability of the study, and it is determined by both the trustworthiness and expertise of the researcher. Recently, concerns have arisen over Nalgene drinking bottles and the chemicals they may be releasing into the water. Two scientists publish their findings. One who works for a major Nalgene producing company, the other does not. Which scientist is more credible?

User Cloudhead
by
6.7k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

The scientist who has no conflict of interest is, in principle, more reliable

Step-by-step explanation:

All scientific publications must include a Declaration of Interest (also known as Disclosure Statement) by which authors state that there's no personal or financial interest that might be affecting the objectivity of their investigations, results and conclusions. If no conflict exists, the author should indicate that "there is no conflict of interest". In this case, the scientist who works for a Nalgene producing company should state that it is a potential conflict of interest.

User Rob Hogan
by
7.6k points