87.8k views
25 votes
Which of the following is a key difference between the cases of Gutter v. Bollinger and Hernandez v. Texas?

a)Pete Hernandez committed a crime, and Barbara Grutter was innocent.
b)Barbara Grutter was a woman, and Pete Hernandez was a man.
c)Grutter v. Bollinger upheld exclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced exclusion to promote diversity.
d)Grutter v. Bollinger upheld inclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced inclusion to promote diversity.

User Gameover
by
3.4k points

2 Answers

4 votes


d)Grutter v. Bollinger upheld inclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced inclusion to promote diversity.
User Qiao
by
3.7k points
8 votes

Answer:

the correct answer for this question is this one 'D.' Grutter v.Bollinger upheld inclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v.Texas denounced Inclusion to promote diversity...

this is the key difference between the cases of Grutter v.Bollinger and Hernandez v.Texas

User Val Bonn
by
3.6k points