Should illegally seized evidence be excluded from trial, even though it is conclusive proof of a persons criminal acts?

asked Mar 14, 2021 229k views

4 votes

by Wared

5.0k points

Please log in or register to add a comment.

5 votes

Answer:

Yes it should be excluded because it is a crime in itself.

Step-by-step explanation:

Traveler answered Mar 20, 2021

4.9k points

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.1m questions

6.7m answers