Register
Should illegally seized evidence be excluded from trial, even though it is conclusive proof of a persons criminal acts?
229k views
4 votes
Should illegally seized evidence be excluded from trial, even though it is conclusive proof of a persons criminal acts?

User Wared
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

Yes it should be excluded because it is a crime in itself.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Traveler
by
7.4k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

Jacinda makes collections on real estate loans. Last year, she made approximately 20 collections and collected $38,000. Must Jacinda be licensed?
Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
1. MIDTERM TEST Midterm 13. Which of the following gives the Constitution the final word in regards to this country's legal code?
Which constitutional amendment established birthright citizenship in the US? (please help)
The only person to serve two non-consecutive terms as u.S. President was known by what nickname?
Link Copied!