Answer:
C ; separate but equal
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct answer to this question is the option C.
The question seeks to understand how both cases were interpreted with respect to constitutional provisions.
From the question we can see that these two cases happened at different times in history.
But due to the similarities and the fact that they are interpreted using the same constitutional provisions, then how this issue were adjudged was based on the fact they are equal but are adjudged at different times